Regulation & Policy
Share
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced charges against blockchain service company BitClave PTE Ltd. headquartered in San Jose, California, for conducting an unregistered initial coin offering (ICO) of digital asset securities. BitClave agreed to settle the charges by returning proceeds from the offering and paying additional monetary relief to be distributed to investors through a Fair Fund.
According to the SEC’s order, from June to November 2017, BitClave raised over $25 million by selling its Consumer Activity Tokens (CAT) to approximately 9,500 investors, including investors in the U.S. The order finds that, as explained in its offering materials, BitClave planned to use the ICO proceeds to develop, administer, and market a blockchain-based search platform for targeted consumer advertising. BitClave emphasized its expectation that the tokens would increase in value and took steps to make the tokens available for trading on third-party digital asset trading platforms after the ICO. The order finds that BitClave failed to register their offers and sales of CAT, which constituted securities. CAT has since been removed from many of the third-party trading platforms, and BitClave is currently winding down its operations and does not plan to continue developing or supporting the platform.
The SEC’s order finds that BitClave violated the registration provisions of the federal securities laws. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, BitClave agreed to pay disgorgement of $25,500,000, prejudgment interest of $3,444,197, and a penalty of $400,000. The order establishes a Fair Fund to return monies paid by BitClave to injured investors. BitClave also agreed to transfer all remaining CAT in its control to the fund administrator for permanent disabling, publish notice of the order, and request removal of CAT from all digital asset trading platforms.
Disclaimer of Warranty
The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only. We make no warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information. Read full disclaimer
Editor's Picks

Why Zondacrypto’s Collapse Would Unfold Differently in the UAE
Walid Abou Zaki
Aug 28, 2026
8 min

The Missing Orchestration Layer Holding Back Institutional Digital Assets
Julian Sawyer
Aug 18, 2026
5 min

Beyond Crypto Access: How ARP Digital Is Building the UAE’s Digital Capital Infrastructure
Anna K.
Aug 17, 2026
8 min
Read More Articles
In the Same Space

U.S. Crypto, Banks Escalate Lobbying Ahead of Clarity Act Vote
News Desk
Sep 10, 2026
2 min

Iran Turns to Crypto as Sanctions Bite, But USDT Has a Control Problem
Salma Naueihed
Sep 9, 2026
5 min

Crypto Companies Push SEC for Faster ETF Approvals and Confidential Drafts
News Desk
Sep 4, 2026
5 min

US and UK Launch Joint Effort to Tackle Crypto Investment Fraud
News Desk
Sep 4, 2026
5 min



