Regulation & Policy
Share
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced charges against blockchain service company BitClave PTE Ltd. headquartered in San Jose, California, for conducting an unregistered initial coin offering (ICO) of digital asset securities. BitClave agreed to settle the charges by returning proceeds from the offering and paying additional monetary relief to be distributed to investors through a Fair Fund.
According to the SEC’s order, from June to November 2017, BitClave raised over $25 million by selling its Consumer Activity Tokens (CAT) to approximately 9,500 investors, including investors in the U.S. The order finds that, as explained in its offering materials, BitClave planned to use the ICO proceeds to develop, administer, and market a blockchain-based search platform for targeted consumer advertising. BitClave emphasized its expectation that the tokens would increase in value and took steps to make the tokens available for trading on third-party digital asset trading platforms after the ICO. The order finds that BitClave failed to register their offers and sales of CAT, which constituted securities. CAT has since been removed from many of the third-party trading platforms, and BitClave is currently winding down its operations and does not plan to continue developing or supporting the platform.
The SEC’s order finds that BitClave violated the registration provisions of the federal securities laws. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, BitClave agreed to pay disgorgement of $25,500,000, prejudgment interest of $3,444,197, and a penalty of $400,000. The order establishes a Fair Fund to return monies paid by BitClave to injured investors. BitClave also agreed to transfer all remaining CAT in its control to the fund administrator for permanent disabling, publish notice of the order, and request removal of CAT from all digital asset trading platforms.
Disclaimer of Warranty
The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only. We make no warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information. Read full disclaimer




Editor's Picks

UAE Stablecoins: Why They Are Built to Travel, Not Stay Local
Walid Abou Zaki
Feb 28, 2026
8 min

The Central Bank of the UAE Clearing the Noise Around Article 62
Walid Abou Zaki
Feb 25, 2026
5 min

Europe’s Crypto Purge: Did Lithuania Just Kick Out Innovation — and is the UAE the Beneficiary?
Salma Naueihed
Feb 18, 2026
7 min
Read More Articles
In the Same Space

SEC Limits OTC Rule to Equities, Raises Crypto Questions
News Desk
Mar 17, 2026
3 min

Bank of England Signals Flexibility on Stablecoin Limits
News Desk
Mar 16, 2026
3 min

Binance Wins Second U.S. Court Victory in ATA Lawsuit
News Desk
Mar 16, 2026
3 min

Kazakhstan Pushes Forward Crypto Industry Growth with Presidential Directive
Chantal Assi
Mar 13, 2026
3 min