Regulation & Policy
Share
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may face an investigation regarding its handling of digital assets, characterized as disorganized and oppressive.
Specifically, the SEC's agreement with Prometheum, a cryptocurrency platform, is being scrutinized as a favorable treatment.
On July 13, Representative Ritchie Torres submitted formal inquiries to the SEC's Inspector General Deborah Jeffrey and the Government Accountability Office's Comptroller General Gene Dodaro.
In the letters shared by Torres on Twitter, he argues that the SEC fails to provide clear guidelines on applying securities law to digital assets, relying instead on enforcement actions rather than rulemaking or guidance.
Torres highlights the SEC's decision in May to grant Prometheum a special broker purpose dealer (SPBD) license, suggesting that Prometheum is merely a façade, serving as a convenient talking point for critics of cryptocurrencies rather than a genuine trading platform for crypto users. He demands an investigation into both the SEC's inability to establish a viable registration process for digital asset platforms and the questionable undisclosed agreement with Prometheum.
Prometheum has recently garnered significant criticism within the cryptocurrency industry, and Representative Torres' call for an investigation is not the first instance.
The company gained considerable attention after its co-founder, Aaron Kaplan, testified before Congress in June. The controversy arises from Kaplan's overall endorsement of the SEC's regulatory approach within the current framework of securities laws.
Shortly after the hearing, speculations regarding Prometheum started circulating on Twitter, with particular focus on potential connections to Chinese investors. On June 15, the Blockchain Association submitted a formal request to the SEC, seeking information about the company.
In July, six U.S. lawmakers urged the SEC to examine Prometheum's "affiliations with the Chinese Communist Party."
Disclaimer of Warranty
The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only. We make no warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information. Read full disclaimer
Editor's Picks

When Assets Move—or Stop—Without Consent: The Limits of Crypto Wallet Control
Walid Abou Zaki
Sep 29, 2026
6 min

Where Do the Dollars Behind the UAE’s Crypto Economy Sit?
Anna K.
Sep 21, 2026
9 min

As U.S. Crypto Legislation Stalls, Circle Launches Its Own Financial Network
Walid Abou Zaki
Sep 16, 2026
9 min
Read More Articles
In the Same Space

SEC Unveils Crypto Custody Framework for Investment Advisers and Funds
News Desk
Oct 2, 2026
4 min

ESMA Proposes New DeFi Gateway Rules Under MiCA Review
News Desk
Oct 1, 2026
4 min

CFTC Updates Tokenized Asset and Blockchain Rules as Crypto Bill Stalls
News Desk
Sep 25, 2026
5 min

EBA Urges EU to Regulate Crypto Lending and DeFi Under MiCA
News Desk
Sep 25, 2026
4 min



