Regulation & Policy
Share
CME Group is preparing to sue the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) over its recent approval of perpetual futures contracts, escalating tensions between traditional derivatives exchanges and emerging crypto-native trading models.
Outgoing CME Group Chief Executive Terrence Duffy said on CNBC’s “Fast Money” that the exchange operator will file a lawsuit arguing that perpetual futures fall under the legal definition of swaps under the Dodd-Frank Act, and therefore should not have been approved as listed futures contracts.
The dispute centers on the CFTC’s late-May decision to approve Kalshi, a prediction market platform, to offer bitcoin perpetual futures — known as “perps” — in the United States. The contracts, which have no expiration date, allow traders to speculate on price movements without holding the underlying asset. The approval marked the first time the structure has been permitted in the U.S., despite its long-standing use in offshore crypto markets.
Kalshi has since expanded its perpetual futures offerings beyond bitcoin to include additional digital assets, further intensifying regulatory scrutiny from incumbent exchanges.
Duffy said CME Group’s legal argument will rest on the classification of perpetual futures as swaps, which fall under a different regulatory framework than exchange-listed futures contracts.
“We have an exclusive license with every single provider of the benchmarks. So all of these would have to go through CME regardless of the perpetual,” Duffy said.
“They would have to list them as swaps, if that’s the way that it came out,” he added.
Duffy, who is set to step down as CEO in March 2027, said the decision to pursue litigation follows months of internal planning with the board.
“I’ve never shied away from a fight, and I won’t shy away from this,” he said, adding that CME intends to move forward with the lawsuit immediately.
Earlier this week, CFTC Chair Michael Selig defended the agency’s approval of perpetual futures, arguing that the U.S. should modernize its derivatives market structure.
“It’s time to approve regulated futures contracts that have no expiration date,” Selig said on CNBC’s “Fast Money.” “We’re going to make sure the product’s available, but it’s well regulated here in the U.S.”
The dispute highlights a growing structural divide between traditional exchange operators and newer crypto-native platforms as regulators weigh how far U.S. markets should evolve to accommodate perpetual-style derivatives.
Disclaimer of Warranty
The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only. We make no warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information. Read full disclaimer
Editor's Picks

Why Zondacrypto’s Collapse Would Unfold Differently in the UAE
Walid Abou Zaki
Aug 28, 2026
8 min

The Missing Orchestration Layer Holding Back Institutional Digital Assets
Julian Sawyer
Aug 18, 2026
5 min

Beyond Crypto Access: How ARP Digital Is Building the UAE’s Digital Capital Infrastructure
Anna K.
Aug 17, 2026
8 min
Read More Articles
In the Same Space

Bitcoin Takes Hit as Iran Rising Tensions Send Oil Above $100
News Desk
Sep 14, 2026
6 min

Final CLARITY Act Draft Puts Stablecoin Yield Under Treasury’s Watch
News Desk
Sep 15, 2026
4 min

EU Puts Crypto Wallets on 24-Hour Breach Clock as Revolut Data Leak Highlights Security Risks
News Desk
Sep 14, 2026
5 min

SEC Seeks to Allow Blockchain as Official Ledger for Tokenized Securities
News Desk
Sep 11, 2026
7 min



