Infrastructure & Scaling
After months of policy clashes with the crypto sector, U.S. state banking associations are moving from defending the traditional banking model to building their own blockchain infrastructure.
Share
Thirty-nine U.S. state banking associations have launched the BankChain Alliance to build shared blockchain infrastructure for tokenized deposits, stablecoins and smart payments, with a target to have the network operational by next year.
Thirty-nine U.S. state banking associations have joined forces to launch the BankChain Alliance, a bank-run initiative aimed at developing blockchain infrastructure for smart payments, tokenized deposits and stablecoins.
The alliance, announced Tuesday, represents one of the broadest attempts yet by the U.S. banking sector to build shared blockchain infrastructure rather than leaving the development of digital money networks to individual banks, crypto companies or external technology providers.
Described by its backers as “industry-owned, industry-designed and industry-governed,” the BankChain Alliance plans to build its network by next year and is currently seeking a technology partner to develop the infrastructure. The project is also intended to be interoperable with other networks.
Kathy Kraninger, president and CEO of the Florida Bankers Association and a former director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, will serve as interim chair of the initiative.
“This is an unprecedented collaboration representing thousands of banks,” Kraninger said.
The alliance said the proposed network would provide regulated financial institutions of different sizes with access to blockchain-based capabilities, including institutions operating in rural, regional and urban markets.
The announcement is significant because it moves beyond the approach that has dominated bank blockchain adoption so far: individual institutions developing their own systems.
JPMorgan, for example, has been expanding its deposit-token infrastructure through Kinexys and JPM Coin, including its move onto the Canton Network as part of a broader multi-chain strategy. The bank has also worked with DBS to develop an interoperability framework for tokenized deposits, highlighting the growing need to connect separate institutional blockchain ecosystems.
But the BankChain Alliance takes a different approach: building a shared network from the outset.
That direction mirrors a broader shift already underway among major U.S. financial institutions. As Unlock Blockchain previously reported, JPMorgan, Bank of America, Citi and Wells Fargo have been working on a coordinated tokenized deposit network targeting 2027, designed to support the movement of tokenized bank money across institutions and enable continuous settlement.
The emergence of another industry-wide initiative suggests that the debate is no longer whether banks will adopt blockchain infrastructure, but who will own and govern the networks on which digital money moves.
The BankChain Alliance also arrives after a year of increasingly public tension between the banking and crypto industries over stablecoin policy in Washington.
Banking groups have raised concerns about the potential impact of stablecoin growth on bank deposits and funding, while the crypto sector has pushed for rules that allow regulated stablecoins to compete more directly within payments and financial markets.
That context matters.
The new network is not limited to tokenized deposits. The alliance explicitly lists stablecoins among the financial innovations it intends to support.
This suggests that the banking industry's response is becoming more nuanced than simply opposing privately issued digital currencies.
Banks are increasingly pursuing multiple forms of digital money at the same time: tokenized deposits to preserve the traditional deposit relationship and stablecoins where broader network portability may be required.
Unlock Blockchain recently examined this emerging competition in “Stablecoins vs. Tokenized Deposits: Who Will Control Digital Money?” arguing that the strategic divide increasingly revolves around liquidity, access and control of the balance sheet rather than blockchain technology itself.
BankChain fits directly into that broader trend.
The alliance said its network is intended to be interoperable with other blockchain systems.
That may ultimately be one of its most important design choices.
A tokenized deposit issued by one bank has limited value if it cannot move efficiently to a customer of another institution. The same challenge applies across different blockchains, payment systems and jurisdictions.
The industry is therefore increasingly moving from isolated tokenization pilots toward shared infrastructure.
Earlier this year, Swift moved its blockchain strategy closer to production as 17 banks prepared to test transactions involving tokenized digital assets across its blockchain-based infrastructure. Meanwhile, European banks have also begun moving beyond isolated projects through shared networks, including the launch of regulated blockchain infrastructure designed to reduce fragmentation across institutional tokenization initiatives.
The pattern is becoming increasingly clear: the technology is moving from pilot projects toward network coordination.
There is an irony in the announcement.
Blockchain and cryptocurrencies originally emerged, in part, from dissatisfaction with traditional financial intermediaries and centralized banking systems.
Now, thousands of banks are being invited to participate in a blockchain network of their own.
The difference is that BankChain is being designed within the regulated banking system rather than as an alternative to it.
Whether the alliance can successfully deliver a network by next year remains uncertain. It has yet to select a technology partner, and details regarding its technical architecture, governance model and participating banks have not been disclosed.
But the announcement itself is strategically important.
The banking industry's blockchain strategy is becoming more collective.
From JPMorgan's deposit tokens and major U.S. banks' planned shared network to Swift's tokenized asset infrastructure and now BankChain, financial institutions are increasingly trying to ensure that the next generation of payment and settlement rails is not built entirely outside the banking system.
The next battle may therefore no longer be between banks and blockchain.
It may be over which institutions control the blockchain networks that bring banking onchain.
Disclaimer of Warranty
The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only. We make no warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information. Read full disclaimer
Editor's Picks

The Missing Orchestration Layer Holding Back Institutional Digital Assets
Julian Sawyer
Aug 18, 2026
5 min

Beyond Crypto Access: How ARP Digital Is Building the UAE’s Digital Capital Infrastructure
Anna K.
Aug 17, 2026
8 min

Exclusive: Flipster GM Benjamin Grolimund Discusses Full VARA License and UAE Growth
Anna K.
Aug 4, 2026
4 min
Read More Articles
In the Same Space

UAE's Zand Expands Stablecoin Reach Across Global Markets With New USDC Integration
News Desk
Aug 25, 2026
5 min

From Hashrate to HPC: The Infrastructure Arbitrage Reshaping Bitcoin Mining
Salma Naueihed
Aug 12, 2026
6 min

Ethereum’s 2027 Hegota Upgrade Takes Shape as 66 Proposals Battle for a Spot
News Desk
Aug 17, 2026
5 min

JPMorgan to Accept Bitcoin as Collateral: The Line Between Banking and Crypto Just Disappeared
News Desk
Aug 17, 2026
8 min



