Regulation & Policy
Share
The U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC) has requested that interested banks submit bids by March 17 for Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, both of which have recently failed and been taken over by regulators.
The FDIC aims to return the banks to private ownership, and is conducting a second auction for Silicon Valley Bank after the first attempt failed.
Investment bank Piper Sandler Companies has been retained to manage the new auction.
The FDIC's preference is to sell both banks in their entirety, but offers for parts of the banks may be considered.
Only bidders with an existing bank charter will be allowed to review the banks' financials, with the intention of giving traditional lenders an advantage over private equity firms.
According to two anonymous sources, any purchaser of Signature Bank must agree to relinquish all of the bank's cryptocurrency operations.
Disclaimer of Warranty
The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only. We make no warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information. Read full disclaimer
It is worth noting that U.S. President Joseph Biden has stated that taxpayers will not be responsible for salvaging SVB and Signature, and successful sales would minimize any capital shortfalls that might occur.
The recent failure of SVB, the largest U.S. bank to fail since the 2008 financial crisis, has raised concerns in the banking sector and for startups that relied on the technology-oriented bank for financial services.
PNC Financial Services and Royal Bank of Canada, which owns California-focused City National Bank, were among the banks that considered but ultimately decided not to bid during last weekend's auction for SVB, according to Reuters.
SVB Financial Group, the previous owner of Silicon Valley Bank, is considering seeking bankruptcy protection as a means of selling its remaining assets, which include an investment bank and a venture capital business.
Signature Bank, which had almost 25% of its deposits originating from the cryptocurrency industry as of the end of September, was closed down due to "a considerable crisis of trust in the bank's leadership," according to the New York financial regulator.
The bank was well-known in the cryptocurrency community.
Editor's Picks

IMF Backs Tokenized Finance but Still Holds On to Legacy Control
Walid Abou Zaki
Apr 5, 2026
7 min

Franklin Templeton’s 250 Digital Deal Signals a Shift Toward Active Crypto Management
Walid Abou Zaki
Apr 1, 2026
5 min

VARA Introduces Virtual Asset Derivatives Framework As Dubai Deepens Market Maturity
Walid Abou Zaki
Mar 31, 2026
7 min
Read More Articles
In the Same Space

White House Study Reframes Stablecoin Yield Fight as CLARITY Act Nears Its Defining Test
Salma Naueihed
Apr 9, 2026
8 min

FDIC Proposes Stablecoin Issuer Rule Under GENIUS Act
News Desk
Apr 8, 2026
4 min

VARA Granted RIV a License, as Attention Turns to the Broader Structure
Walid Abou Zaki
Apr 7, 2026
5 min

SEC Crypto “Safe Harbor” Proposal Advances to White House Review
News Desk
Apr 7, 2026
3 min



