Bitcoin Is Roaring, But Is Its Network Snoring?

Bitcoin’s blockchain is seeing its quietest period in months, with transaction volume plummeting to levels last recorded in October 2023, according to data from The Block. This decline comes even as Bitcoin continues to trade near its all-time high.
The 7-day moving average of daily transactions dropped to approximately 317,000 on Friday, its lowest point in over seven months. On June 1, only 256,000 transactions were mined into blocks. For comparison, the network saw a low of 269,000 transactions in October 2023.
Amid the slowdown, some miners have started including ultra-low-fee transactions in blocks, some even below Bitcoin Core’s default minimum relay fee of 1 sat/vByte. One notable example came from Mononaut, the founder of the Mempool project, who submitted a transaction with a fee rate of just 0.1 sat/vByte. The transaction, mined after sitting in the mempool for a full month, cost only 11 satoshis—or roughly $0.01.
The transaction was eventually mined by MARA (formerly Marathon Digital), a mining firm that operates “Slipstream”, which is a public pipeline allowing for the inclusion of non-standard, low-fee transactions.
“This was a carefully hand-crafted transaction, lovingly selected from the finest hexadecimal characters,” Mononaut wrote on X.
The episode comes as debate heats up within the Bitcoin development community over the handling of such low-fee, non-standard transactions.
On June 6, 31 Bitcoin Core developers published an open letter opposing efforts to filter or suppress these kinds of transactions. They argued that doing so undermines Bitcoin’s core principle of censorship resistance.
“This does not endorse or justify non-financial data usage,” the developers wrote. “It simply acknowledges that, as a censorship-resistant system, Bitcoin can and will be used for purposes not universally agreed upon.”
The developers also expressed concern that routing such transactions through centralized services weakens Bitcoin’s decentralized ethos. However, the letter drew criticism from prominent Bitcoin figures, including Samson Mow, founder of JAN3. Mow accused the developers of enabling spam on the network by pushing for changes that lower the barrier for such activity.
“Bitcoin Core devs are slowly morphing the network to accommodate spam,” Mow posted on X. “They’re now focused on removing hurdles for spammers. Saying ‘this is just the current state of affairs, unfortunately’ is misleading.”
With Bitcoin’s transaction volume fluctuating and fees falling, the community remains sharply divided over the future direction of its decentralized infrastructure and what it should prioritize: scalability, accessibility, or purity of use?