Bitcoin Wobbles, Metals Crash, and Analysts Split: Where Does the Cycle Go Next?
Bitcoin’s latest downturn has reopened an old fault line in the crypto community: is the pullback a temporary reaction to liquidity pressure, or does it hint at deeper cracks in Bitcoin’s narrative as a store of value?
According to reporting from Decrypt, analysts interviewed by the outlet are split, not on the cause of the sell-off, but on what it means for the months ahead.
A Retreat Driven by Positioning, Not Collapse
The leading cryptocurrency has spent the last month under heavy pressure, shedding more than 13% and briefly sliding to the $75,000 range before rebounding to around $78,800, per CoinGecko. Despite the turbulence, most analysts who spoke with Decrypt argue the drawdown appears cyclical rather than structural, driven by short-term positioning rather than a loss of confidence in Bitcoin’s underlying thesis.
One major factor shaping market sentiment was last week’s sharp reversal in metals. Gold sank and silver posted one of its steepest single-day declines in decades. Unlike previous cycles, when Bitcoin benefited from rotation out of metals, the flows this time went elsewhere.
As FalconX strategist Martin Gaspar told Decrypt, capital that “might have flowed into crypto” instead surged into silver in recent months. With silver now cooling, that dynamic could flip again.
Gaspar said traders are watching two catalysts closely: developments around the U.S. crypto market-structure bill, and signs of institutional balance-sheet support. Among the moves generating attention are Binance’s plan to convert roughly $1 billion from its SAFU protection fund into Bitcoin, and renewed gold purchases from Tether.
Liquidity Stress, Not Forced Selling
Market infrastructure firm Zerocap struck an optimistic tone, arguing that Bitcoin still holds a long-term edge over gold as a store of value, even if the short-term picture remains fragile. The firm described the current decline as a liquidity-driven move, not a liquidation crisis.
Others, like Galaxy Digital’s head of research Alex Thorn, offered a more cautious assessment. Thorn told Decrypt that the latest slide reflects liquidation-driven weakness, noting the absence of significant buying from whales or long-term holders. Profit-taking among long-term holders, he added, has started to subside but has not yet given way to meaningful accumulation.
Macroeconomic Tides Push and Pull Crypto
Several analysts pointed out that Bitcoin’s performance cannot be separated from broader macro currents.
Vincent Liu, CIO at Kronos Research, said that the recent rotation from crypto into metals reflects “macro allocation shifts” rather than a loss of faith in Bitcoin. He emphasized that Bitcoin’s store-of-value thesis “remains intact” among strategic holders, even as short-term liquidity pressures dominate trading behavior.
Siwon Huh of Four Pillars noted that gold has gained new relevance thanks to tokenization and its integration into DeFi lending and collateral markets. At the same time, he said, extreme volatility in metals spilled into leveraged crypto positions, accelerating Bitcoin’s downturn.
ETF Outflows Add Fuel to the Downtrend
ETF flows have not helped Bitcoin’s cause. In fact, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs tallied more than $817 million in net outflows in a single day, led by withdrawals from BlackRock’s IBIT fund. Investors appeared to be reacting to a string of negative catalysts that pushed Bitcoin to a nine-month low.
Tiger Research analyst Ryan Yoon said that Bitcoin needs a clearer “defensive use case” to reclaim its store-of-value role, arguing that highly accessible ETF products have also contributed to a speculative, rather than savings-driven, image. Yoon suggested that Bitcoin could benefit from a geopolitical or monetary shock that encourages nations or institutions to embrace it, “the next El Salvador,” as he put it.
A Possible Silver Lining Emerges On-Chain
Despite the caution, the analysts interviewed noted one encouraging signal: on-chain data suggests the market may have flushed out the bulk of leverage-driven sellers without entering a panic phase.
According to Glassnode, more than 22% of Bitcoin’s circulating supply is now sitting at a loss following January’s decline. While this can intensify sell pressure as options dealers hedge, it also indicates that much of the “weak-handed” leverage may already be cleared.
ETF inflows remain muted and options markets are pricing in more downside protection, suggesting traders are still wary. Yet the absence of capitulation and the steady behavior of long-term holders point to a market that may be stabilizing, even if it lacks a clear catalyst for recovery.
The Bottom Line
Bitcoin’s sell-off, as presented through extensive commentary gathered by Decrypt, appears less like a crisis of faith and more like a recalibration under tight liquidity, macro shifts, and ETF-driven volatility. Whether the eventual rotation out of metals or a policy breakthrough in Washington provides the next spark remains uncertain. But for now, the market’s ability to absorb pressure without triggering a panic sell-off may be the closest thing to a silver lining.
