Regulation & Policy
Share
Britain's Financial Services Minister Andrew Griffith expressed that treating crypto assets as a form of gambling would lead to disagreements with global and European Union regulators and fail to effectively address the risks associated with the sector.
The Parliament's Treasury Select Committee had previously suggested regulating bitcoin, ether, and other "unbacked" cryptocurrencies as gambling due to the considerable risks they pose to consumers. However, lawmakers are concerned that considering crypto as a financial service might mislead consumers into believing it is safer than it actually is, despite UK regulators warning investors about the potential of losing all their money.
Britain aims to position itself as a global hub for crypto and blockchain technology and is already working on establishing rules for the sector. Nevertheless, the finance ministry strongly disagrees with the committee's recommendation to regulate retail trading and investment activity in unbacked crypto assets as gambling instead of a financial service, as Griffith informed the committee in response to their report.
Griffith argued that implementing a gambling regulatory system would not adequately address the risks highlighted by the collapse of FTX, a crypto exchange. Furthermore, it would contradict globally accepted recommendations from standard-setting bodies like the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) and the G20 Financial Stability Board (FSB), which have collaborated with domestic regulators in developing these recommendations.
The EU has already approved the world's first comprehensive rules for trading crypto assets, set to be effective from mid-2024 onward. Currently, buying or selling cryptocurrencies is not classified as gambling under the UK's Gambling Act, according to the country's gambling watchdog. Any potential changes to the Act would be the government's responsibility. While Britain is gearing up to regulate stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency backed by underlying assets to maintain a constant value, it differentiates them from "unbacked" cryptocurrencies, which are usually more volatile.
Disclaimer of Warranty
The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only. We make no warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information. Read full disclaimer
Editor's Picks

Why Zondacrypto’s Collapse Would Unfold Differently in the UAE
Walid Abou Zaki
Aug 28, 2026
8 min

The Missing Orchestration Layer Holding Back Institutional Digital Assets
Julian Sawyer
Aug 18, 2026
5 min

Beyond Crypto Access: How ARP Digital Is Building the UAE’s Digital Capital Infrastructure
Anna K.
Aug 17, 2026
8 min
Read More Articles
In the Same Space

Crypto Groups Escalate Legal Challenge Against Illinois Digital-Asset Tax
News Desk
Sep 10, 2026
2 min

U.S. Crypto, Banks Escalate Lobbying Ahead of Clarity Act Vote
News Desk
Sep 10, 2026
2 min

Iran Turns to Crypto as Sanctions Bite, But USDT Has a Control Problem
Salma Naueihed
Sep 9, 2026
5 min

Crypto Companies Push SEC for Faster ETF Approvals and Confidential Drafts
News Desk
Sep 4, 2026
5 min



