Stablecoins & Payments
Share
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) has initiated a comprehensive consultation on proposed revisions to the regulatory framework governing crypto-assets and their associated capital requirements for banks.
Under these proposed changes, tokenized securities and stablecoins issued on permissionless blockchains will be categorized as high-risk assets, aligning them with the risk profile of other cryptocurrencies. Additionally, the committee has outlined stricter guidelines concerning stablecoin reserve assets.
After an exhaustive assessment, the Committee determined that permissionless blockchains entail a reliance on third-party systems, posing significant challenges for banks in conducting comprehensive due diligence and oversight. Consequently, the Committee recommends that crypto-assets on permissionless blockchains should not fall within the ambit of Group 1 classification, which typically follows conventional capital requirements.
In contrast, all cryptocurrencies, including those on permissionless blockchains, are placed in Group 2, which necessitates banks to reserve at least a dollar of capital for every dollar of crypto-assets held due to their inherently high risk.
The Committee has made specific distinctions within Group 1, segmenting it into Group 1a for tokenized conventional assets and securities, and Group 1b for qualifying stablecoins. Assets failing to meet the criteria for Group 1 are automatically considered high-risk Group 2 assets.
Moreover, the proposed regulatory guidelines for stablecoin reserves advocate for stringent requirements, restricting reserves to bank balances, short-dated government securities, and high-quality bank securities. The Committee plans to review the use of repo and reverse repo by compliant stablecoins like Paxos and USDC to assess their eligibility for lower-risk classification.
The Committee's concerns with stablecoin reserves primarily revolve around the potential alteration of securities' quality through swaps and the risk of failing to meet redemption requirements in a timely manner.
To enhance transparency, stablecoin issuers are encouraged to disclose the daily value of reserve assets and provide weekly composition reports. Surprisingly, the proposed audit and verification standards are relatively relaxed compared to the stringent measures adopted by prominent stablecoin issuers, proposing an annual audit and semi-annual verification.
The consultation period for these proposed revisions extends until March 28 next year, and it is anticipated that the proposals regarding stablecoins might encounter opposition during this period of review.
Disclaimer of Warranty
The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only. We make no warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information. Read full disclaimer
Editor's Picks

Why Zondacrypto’s Collapse Would Unfold Differently in the UAE
Walid Abou Zaki
Aug 28, 2026
8 min

The Missing Orchestration Layer Holding Back Institutional Digital Assets
Julian Sawyer
Aug 18, 2026
5 min

Beyond Crypto Access: How ARP Digital Is Building the UAE’s Digital Capital Infrastructure
Anna K.
Aug 17, 2026
8 min
Read More Articles
In the Same Space

Stablecoins vs. Tokenized Deposits: Who Will Control Digital Money?
Salma Naueihed
Aug 20, 2026
9 min

Universal Partners With Bitcoin.com to Bring UAE-Regulated USDU to Wallet
News Desk
Aug 19, 2026
3 min

World Liberty Brings $4B USD1 Stablecoin to Canton for RWA Settlement
News Desk
Aug 26, 2026
4 min

UAE's Zand Expands Stablecoin Reach Across Global Markets With New USDC Integration
News Desk
Aug 25, 2026
5 min



