Regulation & Policy
Share
The release of the latest draft text of the Clarity Act concerning stablecoin yield appears to have been postponed, likely until next week or later. According to a report by Politico, Senator Thom Tillis indicated that the draft is not expected to be published this week, explaining that he prefers to have more certainty concerning the timing of the upcoming Banking Committee markup before making the text publicly available.
A source familiar with the situation also confirmed to The Block that the draft will not be released in the coming days. The delay comes as the legislative team continues holding discussions with banking trade associations as well as companies operating in the digital asset space, reflecting ongoing efforts to refine the proposal and address competing concerns.
Current details suggest that the draft still incorporates earlier language that would prohibit offering rewards or interest on idle stablecoin balances held in accounts. However, it allows yield generation tied to active usage, such as transactions or other forms of engagement with the assets.
According to the same source, making significant changes to the text at this stage would be challenging, indicating that the proposal has already reached an advanced phase. This also highlights the delicate balance lawmakers are trying to strike between encouraging innovation and maintaining financial stability.
Senator Thom Tillis has been working alongside Senator Angela Alsobrooks to craft provisions within the Clarity Act aimed at resolving the long-running debate over whether crypto firms should be allowed to offer interest on unused stablecoin balances.
Tillis had previously expressed his intention to release the draft promptly in order to settle the dispute, which has significantly delayed the bill beyond its original timeline that targeted completion by the end of 2025.
The issue of stablecoin yield has emerged as the most contentious aspect of the Clarity Act, a long-anticipated piece of legislation designed to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets. While the GENIUS Act, passed last year, prevents stablecoin issuers from paying interest directly to holders, it does not explicitly prohibit third-party platforms, such as exchanges, from offering yield.
U.S. banks argue that permitting such rewards could lead to significant structural disruption by shifting large volumes of deposits away from traditional financial institutions. On the other hand, crypto companies, including Coinbase, contend that banning these rewards would hinder innovation and limit growth opportunities. They also argue that such mechanisms could create new revenue streams for banks rather than displace them.
Since the beginning of the year, the White House has hosted several closed-door meetings in an effort to bridge the gap between the banking sector and crypto industry stakeholders. Despite these efforts, no consensus has been reached, as both sides remain firmly committed to their respective positions.
Beyond the debate over stablecoin yield, the Clarity Act holds broader significance as a foundational step toward establishing clear and consistent rules for the digital asset industry in the United States. The current lack of regulatory clarity has created uncertainty for investors, companies, and institutions operating in this fast-evolving sector.
If passed, the legislation could help strike a more sustainable balance between safeguarding the traditional financial system and fostering innovation in financial technology. It would also likely strengthen market confidence and encourage wider institutional participation. Ultimately, the Clarity Act is seen as a key milestone that could shape how banks and crypto firms coexist, while influencing the global trajectory of the digital economy.
Disclaimer of Warranty
The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only. We make no warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information. Read full disclaimer
Editor's Picks

Why Zondacrypto’s Collapse Would Unfold Differently in the UAE
Walid Abou Zaki
Aug 28, 2026
8 min

The Missing Orchestration Layer Holding Back Institutional Digital Assets
Julian Sawyer
Aug 18, 2026
5 min

Beyond Crypto Access: How ARP Digital Is Building the UAE’s Digital Capital Infrastructure
Anna K.
Aug 17, 2026
8 min
Read More Articles
In the Same Space

Why Zondacrypto’s Collapse Would Unfold Differently in the UAE
Walid Abou Zaki
Aug 28, 2026
8 min

SEC Plans Regulatory Path for 24/7 Tokenized Stocks
News Desk
Aug 18, 2026
8 min

Kraken Dust Attack Tests Crypto Sanctions Systems
News Desk
Aug 27, 2026
4 min

Chainalysis vs TRM Labs: The $94.6M US Crypto Intelligence Fight
Ola Rajeh
Aug 26, 2026
7 min



